Everything is Illuminated, pages 75 – 145
Throughout reading this book, I am constantly changing my mind about which sections I like best. The chapters about Alex and Jonathan are hilarious. Almost everything about it is funny – the worlds Alex chooses, the false translations he makes, the Grandfather's bad attitude. It's all very funny. Then there are the parts with Brod. There are humorous parts in her sections too, but more often then not we learn of the intense sadness that Brod feels.
Brod's struggle to understand herself brings up some very interesting and philosophical questions. I particularly liked her concept of “loving love.” She realizes that she is not in love with anything except the concept of love. This concept of romanticizing the world has appeared in several of the novels we've read, most notably A Farewell to Arms and The Wicked Pavilion. Brod seems to suffer from her own intelligence as she gets older and learns more about the world she lives in. I feel genuinely sad for Brod and I found it interesting that this book has been so effective in drawing emotions out of me.
It's strange how the author can go from a funny moment to a genuinely moving one or vice versa. For example, when we think “the Kolker” is dead, I became sad. Then I get the rug pulled out from under me when I learn that he instead has a saw blade permanently stuck in his head, causing him to have violent outbursts. Another example is how the funny portions with Alex are interspersed with sad moments. Like whenever the grandfather is woken and you realize just how badly he misses his wife.
It seems the funny sections with Alex are interspersed with sadness while the sad sections with Brod are interspersed with humor. I think this is what make the book so much fun to read. I never get bored and the author has a wonderful ability to change the mood of the book to keep it interesting. I often think I like Alex's sections better because of the humor, but writing this blog has made me realize how much I like Brod's philosophical moments. My favorite quote of the book so far has been when she removed the hole from the bedroom wall and thinks, “the hole is no void, the void is around it.” I like the concept of the hole – it's nice to think that what truly makes us happy is to block out everything and focus on what we love. The happiest part of their marriage was probably when they stopped worrying about their lives and just talked through the hole.
Essay 2 - Topic C
Whenever there is a clash of two different cultures, there is a need for the foreign culture to adapt to the dominant one. This adaptation allows the foreign culture to “fit in” to the dominant culture in order to avoid any conflict. In America, there is a need for people of other races to adapt to the White American way of life. There is an unfortunate, yet unavoidable truth that White people are better treated than any other race in America. It only makes sense that people from other races or groups would want to fit into the White American way of life. In Passing, Clare Kendry is part African American and in The Namesake, Gogol Ganguli is an Indian American. Both of these characters strive to fit into White American society in order to feel more “normal.” While both Clare Kendry and Gogol Ganguli struggled to assimilate into White American society, their reasons, methods, and levels of success were different due to their respective race and time period.
In Passing, Clare Kendry is living in Chicago during an unknown pre-Civil Rights time period. In this troubled period between the emancipation of slavery and the Civil Rights movement, African Americans were treated with frequent instances of segregation and racism. In order to avoid this, African Americans who had light skin could “pass” as a White person, allowing them to enter into White American society. The benefits of being accepted as White are numerous. White people in this time period were unbound by segregation and could go wherever they pleased. Limits placed on African Americans at restaurants, schools, buses, and other public places were nonexistent for a White person. Clare realized this and readily embraced her opportunity to abandon her heritage and “pass.” While unfortunate, this prevented Clare from being exposed to any racism and allowed her to live an easier, less stressful life. When Irene, Clare’s friend, is in Chicago, she notes that “passing” is a way to avoid segregation and embarrassment when she thinks, “It wasn’t that she was ashamed of being a Negro, or even of having it declared. It was the idea of being ejected from any place…that disturbed her” (Larsen 179). In contrast to this, Gogol Ganguli lived in New York and Boston set in the early twentieth century. In this time period, racism was not as abrasive as it was in Clare’s era due largely to the events of the Civil Rights movement. Gogol’s reaction to White American culture was therefore not based on everyday occurrences of racism. Gogol’s reasons for assimilation were based on his recognition that his first-generation Indian American parents were different from his White American teachers and classmates. He wanted to assimilate into the White culture simply because he didn’t want to be different – he wanted to be just like the people around him. Examples of Gogol’s desire to be different than his parent are scattered throughout the book. Gogol hangs out with American children and chooses a career that his parent’s didn’t choose. However, it’s his name change that creates the largest distance between himself and his parent’s culture. He admits this when he thinks, “But now that he’s Nikhil it’s easier to ignore his parents, to tune out their concerns and pelas” (Lahiri 105). Despite their different time periods, these two characters were both trying to fit into American society. However, their different situations and experiences required different ways for each of them to assimilate.
Clare is able to “pass” due almost entirely to her physical appearance. She is only part African American and her skin is so light she physically resembles a White person. Since she appears to be a White person, she easily blends into White American society. Her ability to pass is further enhanced by her marriage to John Bellew, a middle-class White male. Clare is able to “pass” so well that her own husband doesn’t know she is part African American. She is able to deceive him not only because of her physical appearance, but also because of her convincing family setting. Clare actually has a White family because was raised by her White aunts after her father passed away. All Clare had to do was mention her White aunts and that provided enough credibility to her upbringing. On page 187, Clare tells Irene that she doesn’t need to explain her past because, “There were my aunts, you see, respectable and authentic enough for anything or anybody” (Larsen). African Americans have no definite language or cultural practices to separate them from White Americans – the distinguishing characteristic is the color of their skin. Because of this, Clare is able to “pass” because she looks White. Gogol, on the other hand, is unmistakably Indian. He is a child of first-generation Indian Americans and is not able to assimilate based on his physical appearance. Unlike Clare, Gogol’s culture is also dramatically different from White American culture. Indian Americans can speak a different language and can have many different traditions. In order for Gogol to assimilate, he must be able to portray himself as a White American based on his actions, not his appearance. Throughout his childhood, Gogol tried to separate himself from his family as much as possible. For example, he had two birthday parties when he turned fourteen – one for his American friends and another for his parents’ Bengali friends. He realized that the Bengali party was more for his parents’ benefit and was filled with traditional Indian food and activities while the party for his friends had “pizza that his father picked up on his way home from work, a basketball game watched together on television, [and] some Ping-Pong in the den” (Lahiri 72). His separation from Indian culture was further developed when he moved out of the house and started to call his parents less frequently. Gogol attempted to assimilate by adapting to the lifestyle of the people around him while simultaneously distancing himself from his Indian culture. Both Gogol and Clare spent so much time and effort on assimilation that their acceptance into White American society seemed well earned. However, success in assimilation can only be measured by how they are viewed by the people around them.
Clare, due to her physical appearance and White relatives, was so convincing that she was able to fool her own husband. Even Irene, who knew Clare when she represented herself as an African American, was fooled by Clare’s apparent whiteness. Since Clare was able to convince these two people that she was White, it comes to no surprise that she was also able to fool the general public. No one opposed Clare’s whiteness and she boasted several times that “passing” was very easy. When they first meet in Chicago, Clare tells Irene, “I’ve often wondered why more colored girls…never ‘passed’ over. It’s such a frightfully easy thing to do. If one’s the type, all that’s needed is a little nerve” (Larsen 187). Here Clare admits that all that’s required to pass is to have light colored skin. No one questions it because it’s so hard to tell if someone is truly White or not, even for an African American. Irene refers to the difficulty in identifying an African American in her conversations with Hugh when she says, “There are ways. But they’re not definite or tangible” (Larsen 236). In a time when discrimination was abundant, it would be obvious if Clare was unable to fully succeed in “passing.” Her success is measured by the inability of White American society to discriminate against her as an African American. Gogol, on the other hand, is immediately separated from White American society due to his physical appearance. No matter how badly Gogol avoids appearing Indian, people will still look at him that way. He tried to distance himself from his family’s customs in order to assimilate, but he can’t distance himself from his physical appearance. Along with the recognition that he is Indian comes stereotypes that are immediately associated with him. When Gogol is with Maxine’s family for his birthday, he comes into contact with Pamela, a White female who is shocked to learn that Gogol can get sick in India. Pamela conveys her surprise when she says, “But you’re Indian…I’d think the climate wouldn’t affect you, given your heritage” (Lahiri 157). This inability to fully assimilate affects Gogol by forcing him through different phases of an identity crisis. After he breaks up with Maxine, he is lured to an Indian girl because of their similar backgrounds. When he meets Moushumi, he is immediately attracted to her due to their shared childhood and he finds comfort in having similar experiences with her. He admits, “Until they’d met tonight, he had never seen her outside the context of her family, or she his. He decides that it is her very familiarity that makes him curious about her” (Lahiri 199). But it’s not just the familiarity of a childhood friend that attracts him. Gogol takes comfort in eating Indian food and sharing common interests with another Indian American. At this point, Gogol starts to reverse his assimilation and restore some of his Indian heritage. By the end of the book, Gogol spends a lot of time with his family and makes an effort to better understand his parents. Unlike Clare, Gogol reverses his assimilation after he realizes that he can’t fully be accepted into White society.
Clare Kendry and Gogol Ganguli both desired to assimilate into White American society in order to appear more White. However, this basic principle of assimilation is their only mutual feature. The time periods in which these characters lived contribute greatly to their different reasons for assimilating into White American culture. Clare, living in a pre-Civil Rights time period, had little choice if she wanted to live a life free of hate and discrimination. Gogol on the other hand, lived in the twentieth century – a time when direct racism is greatly reduced. His need to assimilate is much more personal and if fueled not by the desire to avoid hate, but by the desire to be like everyone else. Their methods of assimilation also varied due to Clare’s unique ability to appear White based on her physical appearance. Without this ability, Gogol had to rely on changing his behavior and way of life in order to fit in. He was successful in changing his behavior, but the lack of physical assimilation turned out to be Gogol’s downfall and he ultimately failed in his attempt to assimilate. While both characters returned to their roots in their respective stories, only Gogol had the desire to fully embrace his non-white past. Almost everything about Clare and Gogol’s assimilation process was dissimilar. Their different time periods and backgrounds created different experiences of racism, but these factors turned out to affect only their reasons and methods of assimilation. It was their physical appearance and their ability to superficially assimilate into White society that ultimately determined their level of success.
Works Cited
Lahiri, Jhumpa. The Namesake. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2003.
Larsen, Nella. “Passing.” The Complete Fiction of Nella Larsen. New York: Anchor Books, 2001.
The Bell Jar, Chapters 1-6
It's very refreshing to read a novel written in first person after reading so many with a third person narrative. Not that the previous books were bad, I've liked almost all of them. Reading the first six chapters of The Bell Jar was a very different experience though. I was immediately engaged in the story and I never once found it boring. I may have found it so interesting because it's a new perspective, but I also enjoy how first person limits the reader by staying within the character's mind. For example, I still don't have a good grasp on Esther's character, despite the fact that the story is told from her perspective. Esther does odd, surprising things and we are given no explanation as to why. For example, Esther leaves Doreen out in the hallway after she vomits, but Esther doesn't think twice about doing it. She just goes back inside and we never hear about it again – as if it were completely normal to leave friends in a puddle of their own vomit. Scenes like this remind me a lot of Catcher in the Rye. I don't remember details from that book, but I remember finding Holden's behavior odd. The odd behavior isn't necessarily shocking, it's that the character doesn't it find it odd that surprises me. Another good example of being confined in the character's mind is her situation with Buddy. Throughout the first few chapters we are made to believe that Buddy has done something despicable to Esther – something so horrible, that she doesn't even want to speak to him. When we learn it is because he's had sex before, I couldn't believe that was the only reason. Yet Esther goes on and on about how he's a hypocrite and a liar. I found this to be very interesting because it shows just how misleading first person can be.
This book also has moments that remind me a bit of Saturday (which is a good thing). There are moments where Esther has a flashback based on something she is doing in the present. For example, when she is at the banquet and she remembers the story about her grandfather and the caviar. I think I enjoy events like this because they realistically mimic human thought. It's interesting to see how Esther's mind jumps from subject to subject based on what she's doing.
Out of all the books we've read so far, I find this the easiest to get in to. The unpredictability of the character and the level of intimacy achieved with first person is and odd combination and one that keeps me wanting to read just to see how Esther handles the next situation she comes across.
The Wicked Pavilion, Part 3
The further I get into this book, the more I like it. Powell's writing style and the dynamic plot restore my interest in the story just when it starts to get boring. While this has happened throughout the entire book, a great example of this is at the end of “...the waters under the bridge...” at the end of Dalzell's story. Ben was introduced in the previous chapter, but his character isn't well developed and he seems to be there only for Dalzell to interact with. Towards the end of the chapter I was getting bored of their interactions when Powell did something that she does throughout the book – she referenced a character mentioned in another story. This immediately restored my interest as I got to see what Cynthia Earle was really like and we learn that Dalzell was in love with her. It's these views of characters from new angles that really keeps me interested. From this little section of this chapter we learn a great deal about Dalzell and Cynthia. Powell changes the point of view between stories and we get to see how the characters appear to each other. This was especially evident in the previous chapters when Wharton and Elsie were described from their point of view and of their sibling's.
Another thing Powell does to keep the story moving is introduce new characters. There are more characters in this book than I can keep track of, yet it seems there is a new character introduced in every other chapter. Surprisingly, this doesn't hurt the story, it instead only offers another angle to view the story from. In the chapter “...the Marius assignment...” we are introduced to Briggs – a character that is immediately likable due to his apparent kindness and honesty. The same trend happens through this chapter as in previous ones and just when the story starts to slow down, Briggs runs into Ellenora who is featured in a famous Marius painting. This turn of events is surprising in itself, but we are immediately treated to a point of view change and we get to see how Ellenora views Rick Prescott. I was happy to know that she too thought of her lost “love” constantly and that Rick's emotions are not wasted. I thought the end was a little rushed and unclear, but I can only assume these events are cleared up in another chapter. The events of this book border on the unbelievable as you realize how many convenient coincidences there are, but I don't think they ruin the story. It may be a bit unrealistic, but it's interesting to see a story where every character gets to show their point of view. Without the change of view and introduction of new characters, I wouldn't find this book very interesting.
Passing Parts Two and Three
When I finished Part One, I could safely say that I liked Irene Redfield. She seemed a little hypocritical, although her way of passing was not as bad as Clare’s. While Irene liked to “pass” in public places, she wasn’t ashamed of being black in her personal life as becomes evident in Part Two when we learn she cares a lot for her family and is in charge of the NWL dance. Irene is polite and loyal and I didn’t find it surprising that she didn’t confront John about his comments in out of respect for her friend. My opinion of her got progressively worse as the book went on and by the end I found Irene to be a jealous, paranoid, and selfish person.
Part Two is sprinkled with little hints that Irene is perhaps not quite the person we thought we knew. The first evidence of this comes from her own head as she thinks about a fight with Brian. On page 217 you see Irene resenting her husband for thoughts she imagines him thinking. She feels guilty about keeping her family in New York and turns that into a fear of her husband and children resenting her for it. These thoughts are from Irene’s mind and we, as readers, are offered no proof or examples of these thoughts. This pattern continues through the rest of the book and we have to either accept what Irene is telling us, or realize that her point of view might be skewed. When Clare reappears in Part Two she starts to become likable because you see her trying to reconnect with her heritage. Irene becomes extremely jealous of Clare and even begins to despise her beauty, which she used to admire. At the dance, Clare is seen dancing and talking to many people, black and white alike. This is what makes Irene the most jealous. We are never told this directly, but the fact that Clare can “pass” or easily and so well greatly upsets Irene. While she may have close ties with her African heritage, she longs for the simplicity that passing as white would bring her.
In Part Three Clare and Irene become friends and we are immediately exposed to Irene’s unreliable narrative. Seemingly out of nowhere, she assumes Clare and Brian are having an affair. She has no proof other than her husband is nicer to Clare, but she doesn’t hesitate in making her assumption. As her resentment for Clare builds, she eventually runs into John Bellew and entertains the thought of telling him about Clare. She decides not to, but she almost regrets letting John get away without knowing the truth. At the party at the end of Part Three, Irene is upset the entire night and is convinced of her husband’s affair. When John arrives to confront Clare, Irene decides she “couldn’t have her free” and pushes her out the window. We are never told directly of her actions, but the fact that she doesn’t remember and the guilt she feels when descending the stairs suggests that she pushed Clare.
Irene’s life before Clare was perfect for her. She could pass as white when she wanted to and at the same time was able to keep close to her African heritage through her family. When Clare entered her life, she became so jealous of her lifestyle that Irene was driven to a state somewhat like insanity. She resented Clare’s life so much that she convinced herself that Clare was having an affair. Clare’s murder was a surprising but fulfilling ending that shows just how far someone go when they are jealous.
The Old Maid, Part Two
Part One of this story was a little slow for my taste, especially the beginning where there was a lot of description of New York society. A lot of important plot points happened, but not much in the way of story progressed. In contrast to this, Part Two had a lot of plot developments including the death of Jim Ralston at the beginning of chapter six. This changed the story from one where Charlotte tries to raise her child in secret to one where there is a conflict over who is Tina's mother. The characters of Delia and Charlotte are developed quite nicely and I found myself struggling over who I thought Tina should look at as her mother. On one hand, Charlotte is her birth mother and has a right to be called mother, but on the other hand, Delia has provided a lot for Tina and by the end of the story, has “saved” her twice. I find Delia to be a much more likable character because Charlotte is rather boring and strict with her daughter, but I used quotes around the word “saved” because Delia's actions are really quite selfish.
In Part One she rescues Tina by taking her into her house and preventing the marriage of Charlotte and Joe Ralston so Charlotte could raise her child in secret. Delia has an ulterior motive though. Joe admits that Charlotte only had to ask and he would allow her to continue looking after the orphans, but Delia decides that this would bring shame to the Ralston name and never tells this to Charlotte. In Part Two, Charlotte decides she wants to leave with Tina, but Delia adopts her so she can get some inheritance in order to marry Lanning Halsey. She does this only to keep Tina at her house though. She does it so Tina can still be hers, as if Delia was actually her real mother.
Charlotte, while hard to like, gets some sympathy for her situation. Tina loves Delia's conversations and material gifts and sees Charlotte as a strict, grumpy, old maid. Yet Charlotte does nothing to change this. Only on a few occasions does she mention to Delia that she hates it when Delia is called “mother” and she resents Delia for speaking to Tina about her as an old maid. You almost want Charlotte to go away with Tina and I was mad for a moment when Delia adopted Tina without telling Charlotte. Throughout the story you could feel the tension building between Charlotte and Delia, and I found it difficult to decide who I wanted to win.
The ending, I thought, was perfect for this story because Delia finally realizes Charlotte's situation. I didn't want Charlotte to tell Tina the truth on her wedding night, but at the same time, I was glad Charlotte was finally doing something that she wanted. I was relieved and disappointed when Charlotte didn't go through with it. Disappointed that Tina wouldn't know the truth, but relieved that Tina's wedding wouldn't be crushed. In the last line, Delia asks Tina to promise to, “give your last kiss to Aunt Charlotte. Don't forget – the very last.” I thought this was an excellent ending because it showed Delia's effort to bridge the gap between Tina and Charlotte so that one day Tina may finally know the truth.
Pride and Prejudice, Chapters 32-444
Even though there are many characters in this book, there are only two important ones - Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. These two characters are the only ones in the book that have any depth to them. Every other character in the book is extremely one dimensional and their entire existance seem to revolve around Elizabeth and Darcy. For example, Mrs. Bennet is the same throughout the book. She is loud, obnoxious, pushy, and embarassing. We, as readers, are never offered any look into her emotions or character - but that's the point. Austen treats her and others as simple characters because that is all they're needed for. Mrs. Bennet is reduced to a characiture of a pushy mother because that is all that's needed from her. She helps Elizabeth in Chapter 42 by helping her realize that her mother and father are completely miss matched. She then decides she will not end up like them. Mrs. Bennet's attitude and disposition are one of the reasons Darcy tells Mr. Bingley to forget about Jane. All of the characters are used to set the stage for events that happen to Elizabeth and Darcy. Jane talks to Elizabeth, but she never offers her any good advice. Jane is there simply to provide a way to introduce Darcy and she, like her mother, show Elizabeth how not to fall in love.
When I first started reading this book, I didn't understand that the characters were intentionally shallow and annoying. Mrs. Bennet, Miss Bingley, Lydia, Kitty, Lady Catherine, and Mr. Collins are all very aggrevating characters and are also extremely one dimensional. Others are simply boring: Jane, Mr. Bingley, Mr. Bennet, and Miss Lucas are there simply to move the plot along. At first I thought the book was just boring and filled with these stupid characters. It wasn't until our first class discussion that I began to see the book differently and it wasn't until Mr. Darcy's letter that I fully understood that everyone except for Darcy and Elizabeth are intentionally shallow. We are meant to dislike Mr. Collins and Lady Catherine because we are supposed to know that Elizabeth hates them.
Mr. Darcy's letter brought everything together for me. It acted like a roadmap for why each character was written into the story. Mr. Wickham intentionally tries to make Elizabeth dislike Darcy; the entire Bennet family acts as a reason for Darcy to take Mr. Bingley out of the country;, Miss Lucas marries Mr. Collins as an example of a mismatched couple. These are just a few examples. Every character and every event in the book lead up to the events of Chapters 43 and 44 when Elizabeth finally starts to move past her prejudiced views of Darcy and begins to fall in love with him. I still find the book to be a little long and wordy, but I've never seen characters used solely as foreshadowing and this, more than anything keeps me interested in the story.
